WDW transportation discussion

Login to post comments
26 posts / 0 new
MouseTraveler's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/15/2009
Posts: 919
WDW transportation discussion

This is just a fun, brainstorming session about the resort transportation about WDW.

I've often thought about how the hundreds of busses running around the resorts are not only expensive, but loud, environmentally unfriendly, AND expensive. The monorail is way too expensive to take all around the resort so its not the answer either.

Think of a better way that WDW could transport people around between the resorts,, parks and other attractions. Cost shouldn't be a major concern, as we really have no idea how much money is spent annually on busses and other stuff.

Here's my first shot -

I would love to see Disney study light, unmanned rail that ferries guests from zone to zone on the property. You would only have an attendant at each loading station (much like the monorails) to make sure everyone gets on and off carefully in an orderly fashion. A typical zone could be several hotels near each other, with non-stop service going to each park, downtown Disney, etc.

There would also be switching points where you could change cars (such as if you wanted to go from Caribbean Beach to Animal Kingdom Lodge or something like that. A simple car change at a central point would get you there easily).

Great thing about this system is that through the magic of computers, you could track the traffic patterns and apply additional cars when and where needed, shifting more when one park is closing, and move others as required. You'd also have more cars on routes that are longer since the people moving time is longer and their rotation would be less frequent.

What else could we do with this?

(Pardon me, but I have some extra time on my hands.)

__________________

Visit our website (work in progress) http://www.mousetraveler.tv
Visit our blog (will NEVER be finished)
http://www.mousetraveler.tv/blog
On Twitter as 'MouseTraveler' and 'BigBlueMan'

Brad's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/05/2008
Posts: 4357

It's interesting that you mention that because every time I ride the Wedway I wonder if you could make a viable transport system in a city using a similar elevated conveyer. I mean it would have to be prohibitively expensive, but it sure would be nice.

cdub's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/20/2008
Posts: 3220

It's such a shame though that the monorail is so expensive. Even if it's not the most efficient, I think it's the most Disney way to get around.

SpaceAce's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/06/2008
Posts: 2532

What are the major obstacles to building the monorail throughout property?

I really like the idea of a multi-stop system jutting off to all the different resorts. Too bad Disney can't make use of an underground system because of the water-table.

__________________

[url=http://www.wdwforgrownups.com/forum/'http://www.mickeypath.com/']

[/url]

2010 Beach Club Resort
2005 Port Orleans Riverside
2006 Animal Kingdom Lodge
2007 Wilderness Lodge
2008 Animal Kingdom Lodge
2009 CBR/Polynesian

Imagineer's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/05/2008
Posts: 521

SpaceAce wrote:
What are the major obstacles to building the monorail throughout property?


Money is the only obstacle. I was told once by a relatively high ranking CM that Disney has absolutely NO plans to expand the monorail system because it is just too expensive. And this was before the current economic times, when Disney wasn't talking about layoffs and cutbacks.

__________________

mickey Upcoming Trips mickey

July 2010 - Old Key West

Oct 2010 - Boardwalk Villas

cdub's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/20/2008
Posts: 3220

Imagineer wrote:
SpaceAce wrote:
What are the major obstacles to building the monorail throughout property?


Money is the only obstacle. I was told once by a relatively high ranking CM that Disney has absolutely NO plans to expand the monorail system because it is just too expensive. And this was before the current economic times, when Disney wasn't talking about layoffs and cutbacks.

Do you know if the operating costs are particularly high or just the construction costs? I'm guessing the latter.

Offline
Joined: 02/16/2009
Posts: 269

From the Backstage tour we learned that the monorail costs about 1 Million a section. (From column to column) So next time you ride it every time you pass a column go 1 million, 2 million, Ect. So sorry, we won't see any new monorail any time soon.

The problem with light rail is for it to be cost effective it has to be run at ground level, riddling WDW with railroad crossings and crippling the road systems. If it was elevated it would be cheaper to do the monorail.

Now if all the cars were kept at a parking facility at the edge of WDW (per the original plans) then light rail would be a great way to do it. Should have listened to Walt on this one.

admin's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 2733

marzyar wrote:

Now if all the cars were kept at a parking facility at the edge of WDW (per the original plans) then light rail would be a great way to do it. Should have listened to Walt on this one.


I had no idea he wanted to do that. Question: wouldn't light rail still be too expensive and/or riddling WDW with railroad crossings, etc?

MouseTraveler's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/15/2009
Posts: 919

admin wrote:

I had no idea he wanted to do that. Question: wouldn't light rail still be too expensive and/or riddling WDW with railroad crossings, etc?

We're dreaming here. You avoid railroad crossing by tunneling UNDER the roads. I agree, there is no way we want a bunch of crossings, etc. in our Disney fantasy!

I had heard that million dollar figure on the monorail, but I have to think the million a section HAS to include the cars. A million for every concrete pillar seems a bit out of whack.

__________________

Visit our website (work in progress) http://www.mousetraveler.tv
Visit our blog (will NEVER be finished)
http://www.mousetraveler.tv/blog
On Twitter as 'MouseTraveler' and 'BigBlueMan'

bali's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/20/2008
Posts: 3444

MouseTraveler wrote:

We're dreaming here. You avoid railroad crossing by tunneling UNDER the roads. I agree, there is no way we want a bunch of crossings, etc. in our Disney fantasy!

I had heard that million dollar figure on the monorail, but I have to think the million a section HAS to include the cars. A million for every concrete pillar seems a bit out of whack.



If we're dreaming, I want sky-tubes. Everyone (or each family) is assigned their very own sky-pod upon check-in. Each resort and theme park has a sky-tube station and sky-pod. When you arrive at your destination, you type your PIN code into your sky-pod, and it takes itself directly to an available sky-pod berth. When you're ready to leave, you type your PIN into your portable sky-pod keypad, and go to the sky-pod departure deck. Your sky-pod brings itself to the departure deck, your family gets in, and you verbally tell the sky-pod where to go next via the sky-tubes. (Sky-pods are electric and sit on charging stations in the sky-pod berths.)

__________________


May 2008 CSR mickey

cdub's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/20/2008
Posts: 3220

I think that you could do some kind of light rail-ish conveyance around. It probably would cost considerably more than the buses, but I bet it would be so much nicer.

Offline
Joined: 02/16/2009
Posts: 269

Another thing we learned from the backstage tour is if WDW did install a new transportation system a key design element would be to make it SLOWER than the current system. A lot of planning goes into making you comute time both in resort and in park as song as possable. As a hint wee were told if we ever left anything somewhere by accident ask a Employee to get it, they can cover the resots in a fraction of the time a guest can.

And since we are dreaming, Teleporters...Walk threw a door and here we are.

cdub's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/20/2008
Posts: 3220

marzyar wrote:
Another thing we learned from the backstage tour is if WDW did install a new transportation system a key design element would be to make it SLOWER than the current system. A lot of planning goes into making you comute time both in resort and in park as song as possable. As a hint wee were told if we ever left anything somewhere by accident ask a Employee to get it, they can cover the resots in a fraction of the time a guest can.

And since we are dreaming, Teleporters...Walk threw a door and here we are.

I can understand why they'd want the cast to be able ot get around quickly, but did they mention why they want transit to be slow? Just to soak up potential crowd-members?

Offline
Joined: 02/16/2009
Posts: 269

not just Transit, almost everything on property is designed to slow you down without you feeling slowed down. Sprawling resorts with winding pathways, the location of your bus stops. Even the winding layout of the parks and all the devirsons in them. All meant to slow you down, and keep you on property longer.

bali's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/20/2008
Posts: 3444

marzyar wrote:
not just Transit, almost everything on property is designed to slow you down without you feeling slowed down. Sprawling resorts with winding pathways, the location of your bus stops. Even the winding layout of the parks and all the devirsons in them. All meant to slow you down, and keep you on property longer.


I guess I feel like that's good and bad. If Disney deliberately slows me down, maybe I'll relax more. But because people run around like chickens with their heads cut off in those parks trying to get EVERYTHING done, it seems counterproductive.

__________________


May 2008 CSR mickey

dsoup's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/11/2008
Posts: 2884

marzyar wrote:
not just Transit, almost everything on property is designed to slow you down without you feeling slowed down. Sprawling resorts with winding pathways, the location of your bus stops. Even the winding layout of the parks and all the devirsons in them. All meant to slow you down, and keep you on property longer.

Is their primary motivation to distribute crowds or to just keep you wandering around enough that you buy merchandise and refreshments?

MouseTraveler's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/15/2009
Posts: 919

Disney slowing down transportation makes no sense at all. Everything at Disney is designed to get you in a situation where you will spend money. Every second you are "slowed" is less of an opportunity for you to do so.

Have you ever taken a bus from one end of property to another? They hightail it around those back roads. Plus, they're on a fixed schedule that goes every so many minutes. I don't buy that premise.

__________________

Visit our website (work in progress) http://www.mousetraveler.tv
Visit our blog (will NEVER be finished)
http://www.mousetraveler.tv/blog
On Twitter as 'MouseTraveler' and 'BigBlueMan'

Annie's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/20/2008
Posts: 1610

MouseTraveler wrote:
Disney slowing down transportation makes no sense at all. Everything at Disney is designed to get you in a situation where you will spend money. Every second you are "slowed" is less of an opportunity for you to do so.

Have you ever taken a bus from one end of property to another? They hightail it around those back roads. Plus, they're on a fixed schedule that goes every so many minutes. I don't buy that premise.



I don't buy it in any isolated circumstance, but I can see the logic if they're goal is to keep you on property longer--in a park while you're waiting for bus lines to dwindle, for instance.

Brad's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/05/2008
Posts: 4357

Well a lot of things that "Eat up" people are good. Splash Mountain is a good ride I think because it moves quickly and has quite a few people inside for quite a while. If you had lots of rides like that where they swallow up a good portion of your crowd I think the place operates better. I could see them wanting buses to provide the same function, but I also see MT's point that they're not buying anything on the bus and I suspect that too much bus = frustrated visitors.

MrHub's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/29/2009
Posts: 9503

"Scotty, 2 to beam to the MK"

SpaceAce's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/06/2008
Posts: 2532

mrhub wrote:
"Scotty, 2 to beam to the MK"

laugh That would seem so weird-- people popping in and out of the parks all day. You're pushing your stroller toward the castle, and all of a sudden there's a whole family smack in your way who just teleported in from Coronado Springs eek

__________________

[url=http://www.wdwforgrownups.com/forum/'http://www.mickeypath.com/']

[/url]

2010 Beach Club Resort
2005 Port Orleans Riverside
2006 Animal Kingdom Lodge
2007 Wilderness Lodge
2008 Animal Kingdom Lodge
2009 CBR/Polynesian

subvetss's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/30/2009
Posts: 569

A few years ago Disney was trying out a new "hybrid' bus. They were being tested in Ft. Wilderness and were black. They weren't handicap accessible and so Jan and I had long waits at the bus stops, waiting for a regular bus. Never saw them again after that trip.
Joe.

__________________

LifeIsForLiving's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/06/2009
Posts: 1596

Trebuchet

Whaaat? It would be a fun ride...until you got to your destination.

SpaceAce's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/06/2008
Posts: 2532

subvetss -- I think they're using SOME hybrid busses, but these ones are white and handicap accessible. I guess the black ones lost the bidding war!!

LIFL -- Perhaps they'll have a few of those in the new medieval forest-y fantasyland! A new ride, methinks!

__________________

[url=http://www.wdwforgrownups.com/forum/'http://www.mickeypath.com/']

[/url]

2010 Beach Club Resort
2005 Port Orleans Riverside
2006 Animal Kingdom Lodge
2007 Wilderness Lodge
2008 Animal Kingdom Lodge
2009 CBR/Polynesian

LifeIsForLiving's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/06/2009
Posts: 1596

SpaceAce wrote:

LIFL -- Perhaps they'll have a few of those in the new medieval forest-y fantasyland! A new ride, methinks!

Could thin out those crowds awesome

dsoup's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/11/2008
Posts: 2884

It's be great if they could toss me to the other parks. Just need a soft landing space.